powered by Jerry Wickey
Key West
800 722 2280
jerry@jerrywickey.com

Jerry's Home Page
Thursday Apr 25, 2024
7:49 pm


Create your own discussion page online instantly.   To customize contact jerry@jerrywickey.net
Its free, easy and fun!



Share

Tweet

Status

It turns out conspiracies can exist with out conspirators

no comments
0 subscribers
849 page views   42 mobile   753 search bots

refresh page


Socratic Method is one of the oldest and most respected forms of productive debate. There are many unproductive methods. All of which should be avoided. Socratic method is a very old and respected means to quickly and definitively resolve difficult issues by adhering to rules of conversation which are carefully designed to keep the discussion on track and drive it toward rapid and unreserved conclusion. Conclusion is reached when after carefully selecting questions designed to spotlight an affirmation's error, no one involved in the conversation is any longer willing to dispute the rationality of the affirmation.

Wikipedia on Socratic Method
SocraticMethod.net

In this way, conclusion is forced upon those who remain in disagreement, but have no rational reason for their disagreement. One remaining in disagreement is forced to admit "I still disagree, but fail to provide a reason for my disagreement which others perceive as rational." The irrationality of his or her position becomes obvious to those involved in the conversation.

For this reason Socratic Method is very unpopular with politicians who often desire to remain uncommitted on some issues.

How do I comment in Socratic Method if I disagree?

Do not pose an alternate position or attempt to show that there is a better way to handle the issue. This is the error most make in debate. Nothing ever ends up resolved because both sides continue supporting their respective and opposing views and neither view is refuted. Neither party has any reason to concede. Neither party finds it intellectually embarrassing to continue supporting their original position.

First, make sure you disagree. An argument is not won with fancy words, but by discovering the winning side before choosing your position. Is your position winnable? If not, accept it and change your mind, otherwise Socratic Method will reveal your irrationality to others. Once you've answered that, list the assumptions upon which the affirmed statement rests, and which if shown to be false, make the affirmed statement's error obvious to others.

Restate that assumption in language and terminology which make the affirmation's reliance upon the assumption obvious and ask those affirming if they agree with the assumption.

If the assumption is specious, wait to point out the assumption's flaw in your second question after those affirming answer their agreement with the assumption. Post "Considering that you agree with that particular assumption, do you also agree with its obviously erroneous implication, thus.....?

If you have difficulty finding an erroneous assumption or an error of conclusion implied by assumptions made in the affirmation, double check that you still disagree. You may find, to your surprise that you agreed with the statement all along. You just didn't think about it carefully enough at first.






While I was laying down on one well framed argument against the existence of conspirators after another, I had difficulty explaining away a few very well documented examples of social activity by any other explanation than cliche' conspiracy.

During our friendly debate it occurred to us that I was arguing against the existence of conspirators, not conspiracies. This is how we all do it. We, including myself and my debate partner, presume conspiracies can't exist, because we can't find any conspirators.

I promised her I would apply some math to the subject. I was surprised by the result and adjusted my opinion of what is possible and what is not.

It turns out conspiracies can exist with out conspirators. While the number and likelihood of conspirators decrease as the importance and level of attention on the conspiracy increases, on the other hand, classical conspiracies themselves can exist without the willful participation of anyone.

For those who don't just take my word for it, see the bottom of this email for a demonstration.


This model demonstrates conclusively that in a system of members engaging in activities as influenced by the activities of other members, an orchestrated activity with a singular aim can exist in the absence of any intention by any member. A conspirator-less conspiracy.



This opens up the door for a rational explanation of things like collective consciences and Spangler's zeitgeist, and could validate the infamous (and almost conspiratorial itself) Echelon webbot project and it prognostications as an indicator of patterns in complex and obscure interactions between members of a complex society.

My investigation into this does not confirm the existence of any of these. It only validates them. It demonstrates conclusively that a conspiracy can exist without complicity or even knowledgeable participation.

Leaders must put off the erroneous misconception that conspiracies can not exist merely because no conspirators exist. Conspiracies must be investigated and conspiracies found to be harmful must be stopped.

There are many conspiracies which are helpful. The rules of the marketplace conspire to bring prices as low as competitively possible; and should do so.

Other conspiracies, such as those which pressure commercial airline pilots to conceal observations of unidentified structured craft in flight, may exist. Complaints that news reporting is often politically biased may not be incorrect. Conspiracies which force accredited researchers to fear ridicule for investigating many of the unusual but natural structures which suggest the intelligent design of life must be stopped if humanity hopes to address the unprecedented challenges facing it in the coming century.

To see a demonstration of a conspirator-less conspiracy in a numerical model of a simple society read on.


The Mathematical Model

We all trust our lives to mathematics every day, every time we step on the brake peddle in our car, press the up button in an elevator or board an airplane, we trust our very lives to math, but irrationally, we are suspect of math's ability to tell us anything important or useful about our lives and the society we live in.

Members of society can do many different activities and the activity each choose depends upon what other members do and the level of influence those members have.

A successful model of society must incorporate members, member activities and member influence of other members. To successfully provide insight, it must also reduce or eliminate random variables, reduce the number of members, activities and different influences to a level that does not confound the investigating researchers.

This model allows a user assignable number of members, the default is 225 members. Two activities (a member can be red or can be green) And members influence each other's activity according to this one rule. (If three of my neighbors including myself are red, then I also do red. Otherwise I do green.)

Imagine a satellite view of city suburbs with the roof of each house turning red if the household owns a Ford auto. We could watch cascading patterns of color sweep over the city's neighborhoods as auto advertising campaigns, neighbor and co-worker influences all resolves themselves on the citizens of the city over a period of months and years.

We can watch our very simplified model of human behavior free of all unknown and confusing interactions. The rules of behavior described above are called the Conway Life algorithm which became well known for the many and diverse natural processes the algorithm has been successfully employed to study.


Normal Activity
Model Run 1, (business as usual click to run)

Normal activity has no particular direction. The degree of randomness for the pattern of red activity can be quantified and is more random. Whereas a conspiracy is an orchestrated pattern of activity with a single aim. There is order to the activity and quantifying its randomness yields a value far less random than that of normal activity.

We see most members are green and a few are red. We see the activity spread through the society haphazardly, as we would expect of any activity not directed by a conspiracy.

The patterns we see are analogous to the unexpected patterns of real life activity which result as member's influences resolve in their complex influence relationships. In real life, influence takes many paths and the patterns which are generated are far less obvious. A next door neighbor is physically near, while a family member can live in another city, a co-worker may live on the other side of town. In our model we have simplified influence to one single factor so that we can see patterns more easily if they exist.


Conspiratorial Activity
Model Run 2 (conspiracy)

The beginning pattern of red activity is nearly identical. The single rule of behavior remains the same. No members differ. Yet an orchestrated movement of activity in a single direction emerges.

Notice what looks like a captain of the apparent conspirators. The captain seems to move back and forth herding the conspirators in the selected direction. Of course there is no captain and no conspirators as the model shows the identify of the captain and of all the conspirators changes with each frame of time. None took any orders from any other. None are prearranged nor privy to any information hidden from other members.

This highly organized and orchestrated conspiracy is a product of natural forces.

This model demonstrates conclusively that in a system of members engaging in activities as influenced by the activities of other members, an orchestrated activity with a singular aim can exist in the absence of any intention by any member. A conspirator-less conspiracy.



email link to a friend
tweet
status


Share this discussion with your friends   



Know an expert on this subject? invite them

Subscribe to be notified of posts
Recommend this discussion to a friend

Their email
Your name
this discussion with a friend.


To prevent web bots reckless use of email, please delete the word that does not belong.

to receive emails when
new comments are posted.
Your email

Email addresses are never shared with anyone


Post your comment

To prevent web bots spam disruptions, please delete the word that does not belong.


Name
Where are you from
Email address Hide

Your Comment:         April 25, 7pm

   

No Posts